Legal Opinion

Bodek Son v. Avrach

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 23, 1929No. Appeal, 200PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Schaffer,

This is an action by vendees of merchandise to recover from their vendors (the goods having been retained and subsequently sold by the vendees) the difference between the price paid and the alleged market value, plaintiffs claiming that the goods were not of the kind agreed to be sold. The trial resulted in a verdict in plaintiffs’ favor for $5,106.22. The court subsequently entered judgment for defendants non obstante veredicto- and plaintiffs have appealed.

Defendants had bought at auction from the United States government 3,825 used army blankets. They were…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wright v. General Carbonic Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  2. Tinius Olsen Testing MacHine Co. v. Wolf Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  3. F. B. Fogel & Co. v. BrubakerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1888
  4. Albus v. ToomeySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Otto E. Pritchard v. Liggett & Myers Tobacco CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1961
  2. Marsh Wood Products Co. v. Babcock & Wilcox Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Necho Coal Co. v. Denise Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  4. Texas Motorcoaches, Inc. v. A. C. F. Motors Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1946
  5. Columbia Axle Co. v. American Automobile Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1933

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API