Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Slome

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided November 4, 1947PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRonan, J.

The defendant has- been found guilty on a trial before a judge without a jury upon a complaint charging a violation of G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 94, § 295C, as appearing in St. 1939, c. 459, § 1. The defendant displayed, upon premises which he occupied in conducting his business of selling motor fuel or gasoline and other products at retail and within view of the public highway, a sign approximately *714thirty by forty inches, which read as follows: “Drive In Save 2 Cents Per Gallon.” Each of the four gasoline pumps which were upon the premises and from which gasoline was sold at retail had posted upon…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Lanzetta v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  3. Old Dearborn Distributing Co. v. Seagram-Distillers Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  4. Cline v. Frink Dairy Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
  5. Kay v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1938

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BurkeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  2. Druzik v. Board of Health of HaverhillMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
  3. Commonwealth v. CarpenterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1950
  4. Mobil Oil Corp. v. Attorney GeneralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1972
  5. Commonwealth v. JarrettMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1971

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API