Legal Opinion

Steinberg v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 25, 2007No. A07A0312PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Phipps, Judge.

Lee Harvey Steinberg was charged with failure to maintain lane, driving under the influence of alcohol (DUI) less safe, and DUI per se. After his motion to suppress evidence was denied, Steinberg was found guilty of the DUI per se count and not guilty of the other counts. Appealing his conviction for DUI per se, Steinberg contends that the trial court erred by refusing to suppress evidence and refusing to provide the jury with two requested charges. Because Steinberg has failed to show any error, we affirm.

1. Steinberg contends that the trial court erred by refusing to suppress…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Parker v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1998
  2. Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2002
  3. Allenbrand v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
  4. Cann-Hanson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
  5. Frederick v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Parker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
  2. Acree v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
  3. Harkleroad v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
  4. Monahan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
  5. Barlow v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2014

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API