Legal Opinion

Smart v. New Hampshire Insurance

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1987No. 77324, (Calendar No. 13)PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLevin, J.

Defendant The New Hampshire Insurance Co., issued, for a period commencing May 1, *2381980, a policy of fire insurance covering a motel and other property owned by plaintiffs Ross and Viola Smart. This policy replaced a policy issued by Great American Insurance Company that expired May 1, 1980. There was thus continuous coverage on May 1, 1980, the date on which the fire occurred.

The Great American policy required the insurer to pay the actual cash value of property that was lost. The New Hampshire policy provided that the insurer would pay the replacement cost, a difference found by the jury…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wendel v. SwanbergMichigan Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Galkin v. Lincoln Mutual Casualty Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Chrysler Corp. v. HardwickMichigan Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Cambron v. North-West InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Borman v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. Borman v. State Farm Fire & Casualty CoMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
  3. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. CEI Florida, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1994
  4. Parr v. Central Soya Co., Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1990
  5. Smart v. New Hampshire InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API