Legal Opinion

Ruiz v. Campbell

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 28, 1894No. 263PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Bexar. Tried below before Hon. W. W. King.

1Opinion of the Court

FLY, Associate Justice.

Rosana C. Ruiz, joined by her husband, Francisco, sued appellees for partition of a certain lot in the city of San Antonio, representing that Rosana C. Ruiz was the legal and equitable •owner in her own right as her separate property of the lot, being number 6 in block 8 of said city. It was also alleged that Charles A. R. Campbell and Vicente Dowling each owned one-eighth of said lot. There was .prayer for partition, or of sale if the lot was found incapable of partition and a division of the proceeds, and that pending the litigation a receiver should be appointed to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Harris v. WilliamsTexas Supreme Court · 1875
  2. Warren v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1875

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of FerrisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1944
  2. Taber v. EylerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
  3. Sprague v. MooreMichigan Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Carroll v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of MarylandCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
  5. Cottle v. SandersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API