Legal Opinion

Lindstrom v. Duluth, South Shore & Atlantic Railway Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 1934No. Docket No. 79, Calendar No. 36,673Published

1Opinion of the CourtEdward M. - Sharpe, J.

July 5, 1930, at about 2 a. m., the plaintiff, a young man about 22 years of age, was fishing on defendant’s railroad bridge when he was struck and severely injured by defendant’s train and thrown into the water below.

The bridge on which plaintiff was injured spans the west branch of the Ontonagon river about one mile east of Bergland, Michigan. About 700 or 800 feet northeast of the bridge is a dam, the water running over which makes much noise. Defendant’s regular eastbound passenger train No. 8, running from Duluth to Marquette, left Bergland at 2 a. m., July 5, 1930, on time and got to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Trudell v. Grand Trunk Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Winnie v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Newell v. Detroit, Grand Haven & Milwaukee Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Risbridger v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Stankiewicz v. Detroit Terminal RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API