Legal Opinion

Winnie v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 19, 1910No. Docket No. 32PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error to Lenawee; Chester, J. Case by Albert Winnie against the Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Company for personal injuries. A judgment for plaintiff is reviewed by defendant on writ of error.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, C. J.

The plaintiff in this action recovered a judgment for personal injuries received in the railroad yards of defendant at Adrian, Mich. The facts, briefly stated, are that the defendant’s railroad passes through the southerly part of the city of Adrian in an easterly and westerly direction. North of its tracks and yards, and extending in an easterly and westerly direction, is Michigan street. The first street south of the tracks and yard is Treat street. The next east and west street south of Treat street is Beecher street. Between Treat street and Beecher is a tract of platted land built up and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Perego v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1909

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Newell v. Detroit, Grand Haven & Milwaukee Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Salabrin v. Ann Arbor RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Eugene Richard Cygan, Administrator of the Estate of Eugene Frank Cygan, Deceased v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co., a Virginia CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1961
  4. Dube v. Northwestern Cooperage & Lumber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Lindstrom v. Duluth, South Shore & Atlantic Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1934

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API