Legal Opinion

Bruckmann v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided June 16, 1977No. C.D. 4702; Court Nos. 72-5-01008, etcPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Maletz, Judge:

These consolidated cases which come before the court on cross-motions for summary judgment have been submitted on a stipulation of facts and involve the question as to the proper tariff classification of parts of street lamps that were designed to be operated by gas. More specifically, the parts — which were imported from England through the port of Mobile — consisted of:(1) 100 articles invoiced as “gas lamp stems” which were imported in 1968;1(2) 100 articles invoiced as “gas lamps complete” consisting of gas lamp “stems” and gas lamp “tops” which were imported in 1970, with…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Simon, Buhler & Baumann (Inc.) v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1918
  2. Laurence Myers Scaffolding Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
  3. J. Ray McDermott & Co., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1972
  4. Velan Steam Spec. And Velan Valve Corp. v. The United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970
  5. Velan Steam Spec. & Velan Valve Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. BruckmannCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1978
  2. United States v. UPS Customhouse Brokerage, Inc.United States Court of International Trade · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API