Legal Opinion

Haesly v. Whitten

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 29, 1979No. 5984PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

McDONALD, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal by plaintiff from an order of the trial court, sustaining an asserted plea in abatement and dismissing plaintiffs’ suit.

Plaintiffs Haesly sued defendant Whit-ten, an attorney, alleging that plaintiffs were former owners of fractional interests in certain described lots in the City of Dallas; that Musgrove Company, Inc., owner of another fractional interest in such property brought a partition suit against them; that they retained defendant Whitten to represent their interest in such lawsuit; that plaintiffs instructed defendant Whit-ten to do…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Davis v. First National Bank of WacoTexas Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Kelley v. Bluff Creek Oil CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Arrington v. ClevelandCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951
  4. Terrell Hills Baptist Church v. PawelCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1956
  5. Crow v. CrowCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1972

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Armando Velardez v. Carlos E. Parra Jr., Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API