People v. Gould
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Upon our review of the record, we find that defendant received meaningful representation from his attorney (see, People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137, 147; see also, Strickland v Washington, 466 US 668, reh denied 467 US 1267). While the conduct of the prosecutor was objectionable, it did not deprive defendant of a fair trial. Many of the instances of prosecutorial misconduct were objected to and the objections sustained, thereby minimizing the prejudice (see, People v McCormick, 100 AD2d 723). Other instances, particularly in connection with the prosecutor’s…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- People v. BaldiNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- People v. GrahamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
- People v. McCormickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- People v. EnglishAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.