Legal Opinion

People v. Gould

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 20, 1985Published

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Upon our review of the record, we find that defendant received meaningful representation from his attorney (see, People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137, 147; see also, Strickland v Washington, 466 US 668, reh denied 467 US 1267). While the conduct of the prosecutor was objectionable, it did not deprive defendant of a fair trial. Many of the instances of prosecutorial misconduct were objected to and the objections sustained, thereby minimizing the prejudice (see, People v McCormick, 100 AD2d 723). Other instances, particularly in connection with the prosecutor’s…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. People v. BaldiNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. People v. GrahamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
  4. People v. McCormickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  5. People v. EnglishAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API