People v. McCormick
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant’s principal contention on appeal is that she was denied a fair trial because of the cumulative impact of prosecutorial misconduct (see, e.g., People v Balkum, 94 AD2d 933; People v Mott, 94 AD2d 415, 418-419). Defendant bases this contention on the following grounds: the prosecutor’s attempts to force her to characterize the People’s witnesses as liars; the prosecutor’s questioning of her regarding prior bad acts; and the prosecutor’s summation. HThe prosecutor’s conduct in repeatedly attempting to force defendant to characterize the People’s witnesses…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- People v. SandovalNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
- People v. VentimigliaNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- People v. NuccieNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- People v. ArceNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- People v. MottAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- People v. RubinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- People v. SaylorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- People v. BarnesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- People v. WolcottAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- People v. PrivottAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.