Legal Opinion

Roesch v. Mark Et Ux.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 7, 1943No. Appeal, 27PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Reno, J.,

Appellants, Max and Sadie Mark, husband and wife and tenants by the entireties, leased their store-room property to Charles Lowy and Benjamin B. Gorelick. They subsequently entered judgment against their lessees for unpaid rent under a confession of judgment contained in the written lease, issued execution thereon, and levied upon a refrigerated show case upon the demised premises. The show case was claimed by Alfred R. Roesch as a conditional sales vendor. An issue w.qs framed under the Sheriff’s Interpleader A,ct of June 22, 1931, P. L. 883, 12 PS §2358, et seq., in which…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Beaver Trust Co. v. MorganSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
  2. Rodgers v. Studebaker Sales Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  3. Commercial Credit Corp. v. SmithSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1930

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Horizon Financial, F.A. v. HansenDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1992
  2. Frazee v. MorrisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  3. Bloom v. HILTYSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  4. Family Budget Plan, Inc. v. Ede, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Bucks County1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API