Legal Opinion
Vitamin Technologists, Inc. v. Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 1, 1945No. 10079PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DENMAN, Circuit Judge.
Appellee Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation brought its complaint below alleging that appellant Vitamin Technologists, Inc., and H. F. B. Roessler, one of appellant’s employees, were making an infringing use of a process of producing vitamin D by activating ergosterol and yeast, claimed to be organic substances of dietary value, with the ultra violet rays of the spectrum, produced by a mercury vapor lamp, a use of-the rays claimed to be in violation of one or another of three patents, Nos. 1,680,818, 1,871,136 and 2,057,399. Their filing dates are, respectively, June…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Virginian Railway Co. v. System Federation No. 40Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Continental Paper Bag Co. v. Eastern Paper Bag Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Diamond Rubber Co. of New York v. Consolidated Rubber Tire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Mercoid Corp. v. Mid-Continent Investment Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Morton Salt Co. v. G. S. Suppiger Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Robert W. Kearns, Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. Chrysler Corporation, and American Motors CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- Reeves Instrument Corporation and Dynamics Corporation of America v. Beckman Instruments, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
- Technograph Printed Circuits, Ltd. v. Bendix Aviation Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 1963
- Cutter Laboratories, Inc. v. Lyophile-Cryochem CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
- International Nickel Company v. Ford Motor CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1958
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.