Legal Opinion
Cox v. West
United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims
Decided March 6, 2000No. 95-1068PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
2Per curiam
This matter is now before the Court on the petitioner’s May 25, 1999, application for attorney fees and expenses pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) (EAJA). The underlying facts are set forth in our prior opinions in this case. In the Matter of the Fee Agreement of Cox, 10 Vet.App. 361, 363-65 (1997) (Fee Agreement of Cox), vacated on other grounds, Cox v. West, 149 F.3d 1360 (Fed.Cir.1998) (affirming all holdings; vacating only for consideration of asserted facts occurring after this Court’s opinion); In the Matter of the Fee Agreement of Smith, 4 Vet.App.…
3Cases cited17 opinions
- Hugh D. Cox v. Togo D. West, Jr., Secretary of Veterans AffairsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Fugere v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1990
- Ppg Industries, Inc. v. Celanese Polymer Specialties Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Ferdinand Oliveira v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Savage v. GoberUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1997
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by3 opinions
- Snyder v. GoberUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2000
- R. Edward Bates v. R. James NicholsonUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2006
- Cox v. WestUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2000