Wooden v. Western New York & P. R. Co.
Superior Court of Buffalo
Motion by defendant for reargument of plaintiff’s motion for new trial.. Motion denied by a divided court.
1Opinion of the CourtHatch, J.
I am not prepared to give assent to the conclusion reached by my associate upon this motion, that the court, in sustaining the plaintiff’s exceptions, assumed a rule of law in conflict with established authority regulating the relation and liability between master and servant, and of servants to each other. On the contrary, I think the rule of law announced by JudgeBeckwith in deciding this case, as applicable to the facts disclosed by the record in relation to those questions, expresses the correct rule of law. It is-much more difficult to find evidence connecting the cause of the accident…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Crispin v. . BabbittNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
- Dobbins v. . BrownNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Rose v. . Boston Albany R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1874
- Edson v. . DillayeNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
3Cited by7 opinions
- Gallagher v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
- Hunter v. St. Louis & San Francisco RailroadMissouri Court of Appeals · 1912
- Japan Import Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1939
- Japan Import Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1939
- United States v. C. J. Tower & SonsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1936
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.