Legal Opinion
United States v. Diosme Fernandez Hano
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided April 30, 2019No. 18-10510PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAM PRYOR, Circuit Judge:
*1280 This appeal requires us to decide two questions of first impression for our Circuit: (1) whether a five-year statute of limitations for a defendant implicated by DNA testing, 18 U.S.C. § 3297 , permits indictment within five years of that testing regardless of whether the limitation period otherwise applicable to the offense has already expired; and (2) whether the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment, see Bruton v. United States , 391 U.S. 123 , 88 S.Ct. 1620 , 20 L.Ed.2d 476 (1968), or the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment prohibits use of the…
2Cases cited57 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- United States v. John David StahlmanCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2019
- United States v. Lance CannonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2021
- United States v. Reginald GrahamCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2024
- United States v. Maikel Vigil GallardoCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2020
- United States v. Arturs SpilaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2025
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.