Legal Opinion

Consolidated International Equipment & Supply Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided October 16, 1969No. C.D. 3901PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Foed, Judge:

The cases listed above, consolidated for the purpose of trial, were the subject of a decision in Consolidated International Equipment & Supply Co. v. United States, 58 Cust. Ct. 329, C.D. 2978 (1967). The merchandise involved consists of certain Multineg machines which were classified under the provisions of paragraph 353, Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the Torquay Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, 86 Treas. Dec. 121, T.D. 52739, as articles having as an essential feature an electrical element or device and assessed with duty at the rate of 13% per centum…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pickhardt v. MerrittSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  2. Newman v. ArthurSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  3. Smillie v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924
  4. Consolidated International Equipment & Supply Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Borneo Sumatra Trading Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
  2. M. H. Garvey Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
  3. The United States v. Consolidated International Equipment & Supply Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API