Legal Opinion

Smartt v. United States

District Court, M.D. Florida

Decided March 18, 2003No. 602CV470ORL31JGGPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

PRESNELL, District Judge.

Upon de novo consideration of Plaintiffs objection (Doc. 55) to the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Glaze-brook (Doc. 54), it is

ORDERED that Plaintiffs Motion for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis (Doc. 51) is hereby DENIED.

Report And Recommendation

GLAZEBROOK, United States Magistrate Judge.

TO THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

This cause came on for consideration without oral argument on the following motion:

MOTION: PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL IN FOR-MA PAUPERIS [Docket No. 51]

FILED: January 14, 2003

THEREON it is RECOMMENDED that the motion…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Liteky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Liljeberg v. Health Services Acquisition Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. United States v. Ruth StudleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  4. United States v. Robert E. Cooley Ronald L. Taylor Gary P. Leber Merri W. Turner, Also Known as Merrie Foutz and Charles W. MatsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
  5. United States v. JordanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. CASE CLOSED ALL ENTRIES MUST BE MADE IN 23-13016. Langworthy v. TuckDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2025
  2. Cooper v. Blum Collins, LLPDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2023
  3. DVOINIK v. DWORKINDistrict Court, N.D. Florida · 2025
  4. Dragash v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2021
  5. Green v. City of Willoughby HillsDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2025

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API