Legal Opinion
CASE CLOSED ALL ENTRIES MUST BE MADE IN 23-13016. Langworthy v. Tuck
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided February 25, 2025No. 2:24-cv-13021Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION GENEVA LANGWORTHY, Plaintiff, v. Case No.: 2:24-cv-13021 Hon. Gershwin A. Drain MATTHEW TUCK and THE APPELLATE LAW FIRM, Defendants. ___________________________/ OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE CASES [ECF No. 5], DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR RECUSAL [ECF No. 6], DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO SEAL [ECF No. 12], DENYING AS MOOT DEFENDANT’S LEAVE TO FILE SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE [ECF No. 14], DENYING PLAINTIFF’S SECOND MOTION TO REMAND [ECF No. 20], AND CLOSING CASE No. 24-13021 I.…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Insurance Corp. of Ireland v. Compagnie Des Bauxites De GuineeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Grupo Dataflux v. Atlas Global Group, L. P.Supreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Shane Group, Inc. v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Mich.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
- Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corporation v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.