Legal Opinion

State v. Quiroz

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided March 22, 1989No. 88-1589-CRPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNettesheim, J.

The state of Wisconsin appeals from an order dismissing a criminal complaint against Nilda Quiroz for escape, contrary to sec. 946.42(3)(a), Stats. The trial court held that the criminal action against Quiroz was barred under the fifth amendment double jeopardy clause because Quiroz had already been punished for the escape when her mandatory release date was extended by the prison disciplinary committee. Relying on State v. Killebrew, 115 Wis. 2d 243, 340 N.W.2d 470 (1983), we conclude the criminal proceeding against Quiroz is not barred by double jeopardy considerations despite the prison…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. State v. GrawienCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1985
  3. State v. KillebrewWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. FonderCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1991
  2. Garrity v. FiedlerDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1994
  3. City of Oshkosh v. WinklerCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1996
  4. State v. GrosseCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1997
  5. Scholmer ex rel. Bye v. PerinaCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1991

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API