Legal Opinion

State v. Grosse

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided April 10, 1997No. 96-2027-CRPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtDykman, P.J.

Jamie M. Grosse appeals from a judgment convicting him of one count of escape for leaving the halfway house to which he was assigned as part of his intensive sanctions program. He also appeals from an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. Grosse argues that his conviction for escape violated the Double Jeopardy Clause because the Division of Intensive Sanctions previously imposed upon him a six-month prison confinement for the same escape. We conclude that the Division of Intensive Sanctions' action was not punitive for double jeopardy purposes, and therefore Grosse was not…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Flowers v. Department of Health & Social ServicesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  2. State v. KurzawaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1994
  3. State v. KillebrewWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
  4. State v. ThierfelderWisconsin Supreme Court · 1993
  5. State v. McMasterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1996

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State Ex Rel. Ludtke v. Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API