Legal Opinion
Steinberg v. American Bantam Car Co.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided February 23, 1949No. 9634PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BIGGS, Chief Judge.
Steinberg, a citizen of New York and a stockholder of American Bantam Car Company (Bantam), a Pennsylvania corporation, brought suit against Bantam, against certain of its officers, against Bowes, Kissel and Croll, named as proxy holders in a proxy form dispatched by the management of Bantam to its stockholders. The proxies were intended to be voted at a postponed annual stockholders’ meeting of Bantam. Bowes, was alleged in the complaint to be a citizen of Illinois; Croll, a citizen of Pennsylvania, and Kis-sel, a citizen of New York. The complaint contained the usual…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Houghton v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Steinberg v. American Bantam Car Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1948
3Cited by21 opinions
- Coyne-Delany Co., Inc. v. Capital Development Board of the State of Illinois, Defendant-Cross-Plaintiff-Appellant v. Hanover Insurance Company, Cross-Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
- Elbert B. Connell v. Dulien Steel Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957
- Aprahamian v. HBO & Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1987
- Nodak Mutual Insurance Company v. Ward County Farm BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
- Atomic Oil Co. of Oklahoma, Inc. v. Bardahl Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1969
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.