Maye v. Lindsay
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtStevens, P. J.
The various petitioners, suing individually and as presidents of their respective organizations, commenced this article 78 proceeding to enjoin respondents from proceeding with a scheduled examination for positions as Aides Model Cities (M.C.) in the Eire and Police Departments and the Housing Authority, to enjoin the establishment of such positions, and to declare unlawful ayd unreasonable any actions of respondents to that end.
Petitioners-respondents (herein petitioners) obtained a stay at Special Term. This court, one Justice dissenting, modified to permit the examination to go forward but…
2Cited by10 opinions
- Figueroa v. BronsteinNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Altamore v. Barrios-PaoliNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
- Brennan v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- Carritue v. BeameNew York Supreme Court · 1976
- Watts v. McGuireNew York Supreme Court · 1979
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.