People v. . Hewson
New York Court of Appeals
Appeal, 'by permission, from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered January 9, 1918, in favor of plaintiff entered upon the submission of a controversy under section 1279 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The nature of the controversy and the facts, so far as material, are stated in the opinion.
Read the full summary
Appeal, 'by permission, from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered January 9, 1918, in favor of plaintiff entered upon the submission of a controversy under section 1279 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The nature of the controversy and the facts, so far as material, are stated in the opinion. The publication of the advertisement did not constitute the practice of dentistry -and did not make defendant guilty of a crime nor subject to a penalty. (L. 1916, ch. l29, §§ 174, 190, 203; People v. Woodbury Dermatological Institute, 192 N.…
1Opinion of the Court
The People sue to recover a penalty for the violation of section 203 of the Public Health Law (Consol. Laws, ch. 45). By an amendment of that section which took effect on September 1, 1916 (L. 1916, ch. 129), it was made a misdemeanor, punishable by fine and imprisonment, to "practice dentistry under a false or assumed name or under the license of registration of another person of the same name or under the name of a corporation, company, association, parlor or trade name" (Public Health Law, § 203, subd. B 4). "Legally incorporated dental corporations existing and in operation prior to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Wood v. . Erie Railway CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- Zimmerman v. . ErhardNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
- Bradley v. . CraneNew York Court of Appeals · 1911
- Marx v. . BroganNew York Court of Appeals · 1907
- Cerf v. . DienerNew York Court of Appeals · 1914
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Matter of Dr. Bloom Dentist, Inc. v. CruiseNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
- Lafrinz v. . WhitneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
- Morrissey v. New York State Employees' Retirement SystemNew York Court of Appeals · 1949
- Weiner v. WeinerNew York Supreme Court · 1976
- Gold v. NyquistAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1973
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.