Kretsch v. Helm

This case has been here before. 38 Ind. 207.. It is an appeal from a precept in favor of Helm against the-property of Kretsch for street improvement, and when here before it was reversed, because the transcript of the councill proceedings did not show that bids for the work had been advertised before letting the contract. The'case went back, and the transcript which stands as and for a complaint, was amended so as to show that an advertisement for bids was-twice published in the Indianapolis Journal before letting-the contract. An answer was filed to the complaint, and a demurrer for want of…