Legal Opinion
Howard v. Office of the Chief Administrative Officer of the United States House of Representatives
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided January 4, 2012No. Civil Action No. 2009-1750PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
BARBARA J. ROTHSTEIN, District Judge.
Plaintiff LaTaunya Howard brings this action against the Office of the Chief Administrative Officer (“CAO”) of the U.S. House of Representatives. She alleges that the CAO 1 violated the Congressional Accountability Act of 1995, 2 U.S.C. § 1301 et seq., by demoting her on the basis of her race and for engaging in protected activity, and by paying her less than her counterparts in other racial groups. Howard’s two claims related to the termination of her employment were dismissed. See Howard v. Office of Chief Admin. Officer of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Dombrowski v. EastlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Couch v. Telescope Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Floyd v. Office of Representative Sheila Jackson LeeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Howard v. Office of the Chief Administrative Officer of the United States House of RepresentativesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2013
- Kennedy v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Philipp v. Federal Republic of GermanyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Azima v. Rak Inv. Auth.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.