Legal Opinion

Hevenor v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided February 11, 2003No. 34A02-0203-CR-240PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

VAIDIK, Judge.

Case Summary

Harvey Hevenor appeals his conviction for Dealing in Paraphernalia as a Class A misdeamor. 1 Specifically, Hevenor argues that the statute governing dealing in paraphernalia is unconstitutional because its penalties are not proportional to the enumerated offenses. Because the severity of the penalties for dealing in paraphernalia increases as the culpability required for the offense increases, we affirm.

Facts and Procedural History

On November 29, 2000, the State charged Hevenor with Dealing in Paraphernalia as a Class A misdemeanor. In the charging…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. State v. Moss-DwyerIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Hollars v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1972
  4. State v. KeihnIndiana Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Conner v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1993

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Phillips v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. Lepucki v. Lake County Sheriff's DepartmentIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. Ponciano v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
  4. Lepucki v. Lake County Sheriff's DepartmentIndiana Court of Appeals · 2004
  5. Michael A. Huff v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2020

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API