Legal Opinion

Mann v. Moore

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided February 18, 1902PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Case 84 — Motion to Strike Stenographer’s Transcript from the Record. appear from nerson circuit court. Motion to Strike Stenographer’s Transcript.

1Opinion of the Court

*726Opinion of the court by

CHIEF JUSTICE G-UFFY,

granting motion.. The appellees entered a motion to strike from the record the paper filed as, and purporting to be, a transcript of the official stenographer’s shorthand report of the. testimony taken in court on the trial of this case, because they say that said pretended- transcript is' improperly and without right or authority filed in this court, and can not be considered on this appeal, because same, is not attested -by the judge before whom the trial was had, as required by section 4644, Kentucky Statutes, and not identified as required! by…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Patrick v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1926
  2. Louisville & N. R. v. Paul's Adm'rCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1951
  3. Gee v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918
  4. Easley & Siegleman v. KramerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1936
  5. Louisville & N. R. v. Paul's Adm'rCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API