Legal Opinion
Richard J. Spitz, Inc. v. Dill
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 22, 1956PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WEINFELD, District Judge.
The plaintiff, an importer of spices, brings this suit for a judgment declaring that the action of the defendant, the Collector of Customs, in refusing to permit the entry of 2,010 bales of cassia, 1 is arbitrary and not authorized by law. The complaint also seeks a preliminary and permanent injunction restraining the Collector from prohibiting the entry of the cassia. The matter is before the Court on plaintiff’s motion for the preliminary injunction and defendant’s cross-motion to dismiss the complaint.
The cassia, which arrived at the Port of New York between…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Dioguardi v. DurningCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
- Williams v. FanningSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Foundry Services, Inc. v. Beneflux CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1953
- Hall Signal Co. v. General Ry. Signal Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1907
- Truth Seeker Co. v. DurningCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Federal Maritime Commission v. Atlantic & Gulf/Panama Canal ZoneDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1965
- Precise Imports Corp. v. KellyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
- R. C. W., Supervisor, Inc. v. Cuban Tobacco Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1963
- G. P. Putnam's Sons v. Lancer Books, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1965
- Dinkins v. General Aniline & Film Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1962
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.