Legal Opinion
Forest Guardians v. Forsgren
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided February 23, 2007No. 05-2181PublishedCited by 276 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BALDOCK, Circuit Judge.
The United States Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) has listed a “distinct population segment” (DPS) of Canada Lynx as “threatened” under the Endangered Species Act (ESA), 16 U.S.C. §§ 1631-44. See Determination of Threatened Status for the Contiguous U.S. Distinct Population Segment of the Canada Lynx and Related Ride, 65 Fed.Reg. 16052 (March 24, 2000) (Final Rule), clarified by Notice of Remanded Determination of Status for the Contiguous U.S. Distinct Population Segment of the Canada Lynx, 68 Fed.Reg. 40076 (July 3, 2003) (Rule Clarification). Forest Guardians and…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Tennessee Valley Authority v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Norton v. Southern Utah Wilderness AllianceSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Ohio Forestry Assn., Inc. v. Sierra ClubSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Idaho Conservation League v. MummaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by276 opinions
- Commonwealth Property Advocates, LLC v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- Lane v. SimonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- Ellis Ex Rel. Estate of Ellis v. Ogden CityCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- LTF Real Estate Co. v. Expert South Tulsa, LLC (In re Expert South Tulsa, LLC)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Tenth Circuit · 2014
- Gordon v. Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 2018
271 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.