Legal Opinion

Jaffray v. Jennings

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 25, 1894PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Certiorari -to Lapeer. (Moore, J.) Plaintiffs bring certiorari to review proceedings dissolving an attachment. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.

Plaintiffs were copartners', residing in New York, and were jobbers, of whom the defendants (father and son, and also partners) purchased goods. The son, Ward L. Jennings, having purchased a quantity of goods for his firm from the plaintiffs, the latter commenced proceedings by attachment upon an affidavit which alleged that the defendants fraudulently contracted the debt upon which the action was brought, viz., that arising from the purchase mentioned.2 The writ was levied upon property belonging to the father, and upon his application the attachment was dissolved by the circuit judge. It…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In re SmithNew York Supreme Court · 1819
  2. Estlow v. HannaMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  3. People ex rel. Miller v. Judge of the Circuit CourtMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
  4. Edwards v. HughesMichigan Supreme Court · 1870
  5. In re ChipmanNew York Supreme Court · 1817

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Schoenfeld v. BourneMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Cottrell v. HathewayMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Barry's Town & Suburban, Inc. v. CohenNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1989
  4. Bowman v. WadeOregon Supreme Court · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API