Legal Opinion
Holton v. Secretary of the Dep't of Health & Human Services
United States Court of Claims
Decided June 21, 1991No. 89-22VPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
TURNER, Judge.
Petitioner seeks review of the special master’s April 12, 1991 decision awarding attorney fees and costs far below those requested and awarding damages for pain and suffering and lost wages which were not requested. (The decision awarded $17,-325 in attorney fees, $5448.78 in costs and $7226.22 for pain, suffering and lost wages.) The special master had earlier recommended that petitioner receive compensation for unreimbursable expenses in the amount of $1,629,633 (net present val*393ue) for injuries sustained as a result of a diptheria-pertussis-tetanus (DPT)…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. Arkansas-Best Freight System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Martin J. Simko Construction, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Sumrall v. Secretary of the Department of Health & Human ServicesUnited States Court of Claims · 1991
3Cited by5 opinions
- Raymo v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- Estrada v. Secretary of the Department of Health & Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
- Guerrero v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- McCulloch v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- O'Neill v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015