Legal Opinion
Schering Corp. v. Amgen, Inc.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided January 10, 2001No. Civ.A. No. 96-587-GMSPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
SLEET, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
The defendant in this case, Amgen, Inc. (“Amgen”) seeks leave to file a motion for attorneys’ fees and to recoup costs against the plaintiffs, Schering Corporation and Biogen, Inc (collectively “Schering”) arising from a judgment entered in its favor by the Honorable Murray M. Schwartz (D.1.231). Amgen filed both a Bill of Costs pursuant to Local Rule 54.1 (D.1.238) and a Motion for Renewed Leave to File a Motion and Brief for Attorney’s Fees (D.I.239) on September 6, 2000. Schering raises the following objections (1) Amgen’s motion…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Pioneer Investment Services Co. v. Brunswick Associates Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- State of Illinois v. Sangamo Construction Co. And J. L. Simmons Company, Inc., DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981
- Reactive Metals and Alloys Corporation v. Esm, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- Jeffrey A. Mints v. Educational Testing ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
- Dominic v. Hess Oil V.I. Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Stephen Tancredi and Ronald Speidel v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, a New York Stock Company, and Metlife, Inc., a Delaware Holding CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- Summit Technology, Inc. v. Nidek Co., LtdCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Adapt of Philadelphia v. Philadelphia Housing AuthorityDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2007
- Cordance Corp v. Amazon.com, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2012
- Crandall v. CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER, COLO.District Court, D. Colorado · 2009
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.