Legal Opinion
Stundal v. Stundal
Montana Supreme Court
Decided January 27, 2000No. 99-458PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Nelson
¶1 Carol Stundal (Carol) appeals from the order of the District Court of the Fifteenth Judicial District, Sheridan County, dated June 8,1999, denying her motion to amend her Petition for Dissolution of Marriage. The amendment would have requested that her husband, Francis Earl Stundal (Francis), be required to pay spousal support. We affirm.
BACKGROUND
¶2 Carol filed her petition for dissolution on February 13,1997. At the time she filed for dissolution she worked as a customs inspector, earning approximately $40,000 per year. Approximately six months after she filed her petition for…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Lindey's Inc. v. Professional Consultants, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1990
- Kearns v. McIntyre Construction Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1977
- Peuse v. MalkuchMontana Supreme Court · 1996
- Hobble-Diamond Cattle Co. v. Triangle Irrigation Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1991
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Stevens v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.Montana Supreme Court · 2010
- Allison v. Town of Clyde ParkMontana Supreme Court · 2000
- Donaldson v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2012
- Peeler v. Rocky Mountain Log Homes Can., Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2018
- Stafford v. FockaertMontana Supreme Court · 2014
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.