Legal Opinion

Link v. Southeastern Greyhound Lines

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided May 6, 1955PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice SwepstoN

Everett C. Link filed his petition for workmen’s compensation and brought suit against Southeastern Greyhound Lines, and the summons was served upon A. G. Gibson as the District Manager. This suit was filed just two days before the one-year period from the date of injury had expired, that is, the injury occurred June 30, 1951, and the suit was filed on June 28, 1952.

The defendant filed a plea in abatement stating that there is no such corporation as Southeastern Greyhound Lines and that there was no such corporation on or about June 30,1951, the date of the alleged injuries.

Plaintiff filed a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Love v. Southern Railway Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Railway Co. v. MahoneyTennessee Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Macklin v. DunnTennessee Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Gardner v. QuinnTennessee Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway v. FosterTennessee Supreme Court · 1882

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of HaskinsCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2006
  2. McCleary v. MorganCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API