Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Ramirez

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided December 12, 2007No. WR-25,057-06PublishedCited by 70 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

2Per curiam

We conclude that Rodney John Ramirez is not entitled to habeas relief because the record does not show that his trial counsel rendered ineffective assistance.

I. Procedural Background

Ramirez was convicted by a jury of two counts of burglary of a habitation. The trial judge assessed his punishment at eighty-one years’ imprisonment. Ramirez appealed and, in an unpublished opinion, the Eighth Court of Appeals affirmed the judgment of the trial court. 1

II. Factual Background

Setting out the facts of the burglary offense, the court of appeals stated, in relevant part:

During the evening of May…

3Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Thompson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999
  3. McFarland v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
  4. Ex Parte WhiteCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2004
  5. King v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by70 opinions

  1. Stokes v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2009
  2. Barnett v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2011
  3. Robinson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2017
  4. Eber Martinez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2014
  5. Barnett v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2011

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API