Legal Opinion

Barnett v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)

Decided April 12, 2011No. 06-10-00092-CRPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

BY THE COURT.

After having been convicted of aggravated assault with a deadly weapon, suffering two sentence enhancements, and being sentenced to fifty years’ imprisonment, Randy Dale Barnett filed a motion for new trial complaining of, inter alia, ineffective assistance of his trial counsel. Barnett’s motion alleged that his attorney failed to (1) “object to testimony offered during the guilt innocence phase of the trial concerning the defendant’s past criminal history and incarceration in the penitentiary”; (2) “object to repeated extraneous offense evidence during the guilt innocence…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Wiggins v. Smith, WardenSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  4. Goodspeed v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2005
  5. Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2009

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Eric Christopher Gonzalez A/K/A Eric Christobal Gonzalez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2014
  2. Carroll v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2012
  3. Alexi Dominick Hemphill v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2014
  4. Alexi Dominick Hemphill v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2015
  5. Anthony Lamar Harvey v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2012

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API