Legal Opinion

Pittsburg Vitrified Paving & Building Brick Co. v. Fisher

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 6, 1909No. 15,689PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Error from Crawford district court; Arthur Fuller, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Burch, J.:

James Lareau was employed by the defendant to work in its brick plant. His clothing caught on a set-screw projecting from a revolving shaft in the plant and he was killed. The administrator of his *578estate sued the defendant and recovered damages for the benefit of the deceased-’s next of kin, his father and mother. The defendant prosecutes error.

At the time of the casualty Lareau’s specific duties were those of an off-bearer from a repressing-machine. He removed pressed brick from a belt which carried them from the repressing-machine and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. FajardoSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906
  2. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. MoffattSupreme Court of Kansas · 1899
  3. Union Pacific Railway Co. v. DundenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1887
  4. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. RyanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1901
  5. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railroad v. CrossSupreme Court of Kansas · 1897

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Wentling v. Medical Anesthesia ServicesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1985
  2. Jackson ex rel. Jackson v. ButlerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1913
  3. Corman, Administrator v. WEG Dial Telephone, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1965
  4. Haas v. Kansas City Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1921
  5. Cincinnati, Hamilton & Dayton Railway Co. v. ArmuthIndiana Supreme Court · 1913

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API