Legal Opinion

Idaho State Bar v. Matthews

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1994No. 20584PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

I

BACKGROUND AND PROCEDURE

The essential facts in this attorney disciplinary matter are not in dispute. Suzanne and Stephen Patterson (the “Pattersons”) hired Howard W. Matthews (“Matthews”) to file a Chapter 7 bankruptcy petition on their behalf. The bankruptcy trustee objected to the Pattersons’ claimed homestead exemption and Matthews did not respond to the claim. The bankruptcy trustee’s attorney notified Matthews that the trustee intended to liquidate the property for its equity, and that the Pattersons’ failure to cooperate would result in the revocation of their bankruptcy discharge. The…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Matter of TwayIdaho Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Williams v. Idaho State BarIdaho Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Patterson v. Idaho State BarIdaho Supreme Court · 1994

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Idaho State Bar v. SouzaIdaho Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Idaho State Bar v. GantenbeinIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Idaho State Bar v. JenkinsIdaho Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Beeson v. Idaho State BarIdaho Supreme Court · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API