Legal Opinion

(PC) Lipsey v. Seitz

District Court, E.D. California

Decided December 16, 2019No. 1:18-cv-00766Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CHRISTOPHER LIPSEY, JR., Case No.: 1:18-cv-00766-AWI-SKO (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO FILE A THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT 13 v. OR NOTIFY THE COURT OF HIS DESIRE TO PROCEED ONLY ON CLAIM FOUND 14 B. SEITZ, et al., COGNIZABLE 15 Defendants. (Doc. 21) 16 21-DAY DEADLINE 17 18 Plaintiff Christopher Lipsey, Jr., an inmate proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, 19 alleges that the defendants retaliated against him in violation of the First Amendment and denied 20 him access to the courts.1 (Doc.…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Jones v. BockSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. Porter v. NussleSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. Ross v. BlakeSupreme Court of the United States · 2016

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API