Dade County v. American Hospital of Miami, Inc.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1DissentDaniel S. Pearson, Judge
Judge Schwartz’s dissenting opinion quite clearly demonstrates that the legal duty of the County to provide and pay for medical care for its indigent residents is nowhere to be found in any statute or other writing referred to in the majority opinion. Since that is the case, I suspect that the unstated premise of the majority’s holding is that no legislation imposing this duty is required, either because the duty was recognized at common law or, if not, because the duty should be recognized by us, the court. The premise is wrong.
Under the common law, no body politic is legally obligated to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hamlin County v. Clark CountySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1890
- Patrick v. Town of BaldwinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
- Roane v. Hutchinson CountySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1918
- Willacy County v. Valley Baptist HospitalCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
- Mandan Deaconess Hospital v. County of SiouxNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1933
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.