Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Gaston County Dyeing Machine Co. v. Northfield Insurance

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 1, 1998No. COA97-1143Published

1Concurrence

Judge Greene

concurring.

The first issue addressed by the majority is whether the policies in issue require the loss to be determined on the date of its discovery or on the date the damage is sustained. The majority holds that this Court has previously answered that question in favor of the “date of discovery” rule, citing West American Insurance Co. v. Tufco Flooring East, 104 N.C. App. 312, 409 S.E.2d 692 (1991), disc. review improvidently allowed, 332 N.C. 479, 420 S.E.2d 826 (1992). I do not read Tufco that broadly. I read that case as holding that when the actual date of damage cannot be…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In Re the Appeal From the Civil PenaltySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
  2. West American Insurance Co. v. Tufco Flooring East, IncCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
  3. Paul J. Mraz v. Canadian Universal Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1986
  4. Home Indemnity Co. v. Hoechst Celanese Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
  5. Home Indemnity Co. v. Hoechst Celanese Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API