Legal Opinion

Home Indemnity Co. v. Hoechst Celanese Corp.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided January 6, 1998No. COA97-459PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EAGLES, Judge.

I

We first consider whether the trial court erred in granting partial summary judgment on the grounds that coverage under the policies was not triggered by claims arising from property damage that occurred during the years in which the policies were in effect because the contamination was not discovered until after the policies expired.

In our companion opinion (96-1435) we have reaffirmed that West American Ins. Co. v. Tufco Flooring East, Inc., 104 N.C. App. 312, 409 S.E.2d 692 (1991), review allowed, 330 N.C. 853, 413 S.E.2d 555, review denied as improvidently granted, 332 N.C.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Waste Management of Carolinas, Inc. v. Peerless InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  2. Highlands Insurance v. Aerovox Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
  3. West American Insurance Co. v. Tufco Flooring East, IncCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
  4. Paul J. Mraz v. Canadian Universal Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1986
  5. Techalloy Co. v. Reliance InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State of California v. Allstate Ins. Co.California Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Travelers Cas. & Sur. Co. v. Superior Court of Santa Clara Cty.California Court of Appeal · 1998
  3. Allstate Ins. Co. v. Runyon ChattertonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
  4. Home Indem. Co. v. Hoechst Celanese Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
  5. Hartford Cas. Ins. Co. v. GelshenenDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2019

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API