Legal Opinion

Tinnerman v. Baldwin

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided April 11, 1955No. 18902PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Almand, Justice.

To the application of Charles O. Baldwin to probate in solemn form the will of Thomas C. Baldwin, Mrs. Nonnie Mae Tinnerman filed a caveat, alleging herself to be the only child and sole heir at law of the testator, on the ground that the will was executed by reason of the undue influence of Charles O. Baldwin, the propounder; that the will was.executed by reason of fraudulent representations and deceptions practiced by the propounder on the testator. It was further charged in the caveat that the testator was afflicted with a monomania as against the caveatrix, his only child,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Perdue v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
  2. Herndon v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934
  3. Coates v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
  4. Barnett v. StrainSupreme Court of Georgia · 1921
  5. Jackson v. CrutchfieldSupreme Court of Georgia · 1937

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Pierce v. PierceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1978
  2. Isley v. LittleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1963
  3. Bethea v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
  4. In Re Estate of Addie Etoy HarrisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API