Clint D. Watkins v. State

BURKE, Chief Justice.

[¶1] Appellant, Clint D. Watkins, was convicted of two counts of first-degree sexual abuse of a minor. On appeal, he claims that prosecutorial misconduct deprived him of a fair trial. We conclude there was no misconduct, and affirm.

ISSUE

[¶2] The sole issue presented by Appellant is whether the prosecutor committed prose-cutorial misconduct during rebuttal argument, impermissibly invading the province of the jury.

FACTS

[¶3] Appellant was charged with two counts of sexual abuse of a minor in the first degree, in violation of Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 6-2-314(a)(ii) (LexisNexis…