Legal Opinion · Dissent

People v. Joezell Williams

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 31, 2006No. Docket 128294, 128533Published

1DissentCorrigan, J.

0dissenting). I respectfully dissent from the majority’s declination to tackle the central question presented in this case, i.e., whether double-jeopardy principles prohibit the imposition of multiple punishments for the underlying offense of larceny from the person of another, MCL 750.357, and first-degree murder based on alternative theories of premeditated murder and felony murder, MCL 750.316(1). I would hold this case in abeyance for the decision in People v Smith (Docket No. 130353), lv gtd 475 Mich 864 (2006), in which we have granted leave to appeal to consider the appropriate test…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. People v. RobideauMichigan Supreme Court · 1984
  3. People v. NuttMichigan Supreme Court · 2004
  4. People v. WilderMichigan Supreme Court · 1981
  5. People v. HardingMichigan Supreme Court · 2006

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API