Legal Opinion

People v. Harding

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 7, 2006No. Docket Nos. 91097, 91177, (Calendar Nos. 6-7 April)PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrickley, J.

We granted leave to appeal in these cases to consider the double jeopardy implications of a criminal prosecution in which the defendants were tried and convicted of armed robbery, assault with intent to commit murder, and two counts of felony-firearm arising out of those felonies; and then, over four years later, after the victim died as a result of the assault, were prosecuted and convicted of felony murder and felony-firearm. For the reasons stated below, we hold that the subsequent prosecutions are not barred by the United States or Michigan Constitutions; however, we also hold *696that the…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Brown v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. People v. . ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  2. People v. NuttMichigan Supreme Court · 2004
  3. People v. MartinMichigan Court of Appeals · 2006
  4. People v. ReamMichigan Supreme Court · 2008
  5. People v. LeeMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API