Legal Opinion
Norton v. City of South Portland
District Court, D. Maine
Decided December 9, 2011No. 2:10-cv-287-GZSPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
GEORGE Z. SINGAL, District Judge.
Before the Court is Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket # 12). For reasons explained herein, the Court GRANTS the Motion.
I. LEGAL STANDARD
Generally, a party is entitled to summary judgment if, on the record before the Court, it appears “that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(c)(2). “[T]he mere existence of some alleged factual dispute between the parties will not defeat an otherwise properly supported motion for…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- BAKER v. GOODMANDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2022
- Claro v. Sulphur, City ofDistrict Court, E.D. Oklahoma · 2019
- Conlon v. ScaltretoDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2024
- Conlon v. ScaltretoDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2024
- State v. DeCiccioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2014