Legal Opinion
Indiana Insurance Company v. Patricia Kopetsky, and KB Home Indiana Inc.
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided August 7, 2014No. 49A02-1304-PL-340PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BRADFORD, Judge.
CASE SUMMARY
Appellee/Defendant/Counterclaim Plaintiff Patricia Kopetsky has petitioned for rehearing. Patricia requests that we correct a factual error in our original opinion and clarify our holding regarding a possible finding that George Kopetsky knew (or did not know) of contamination in Cedar Park prior to obtaining CGL coverage from Appellant/Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant Indiana Insurance Company. In its response to Patricia’s petition, Indiana Insurance also requests that we clarify our holding regarding George’s knowledge. We grant Patricia’s rehearing…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Montrose Chemical Corp. v. Admiral InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Sheehan Construction Co. v. Continental Casualty Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 2010
- Sheehan Construction Co. v. Continental Casualty Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 2010
- General Housewares Corp. v. National Surety Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2000
- Pittston Co. Ultramar America Ltd. v. Allianz InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Berry Plastics Corporation v. Illinois National Insurance CoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
- Carmine Greene v. Westfield Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020
- Adkins v. WillDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2019
- Allianz Global Risks US Insurance Company v. Technicolor USA, IncIndiana Court of Appeals · 2025
- Berry Plastics Corporation v. Illinois National Insurance CoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.