Legal Opinion

Hazen v. Reed

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 13, 1874PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Error to Kent Circuit.

1Opinion of the Court

Graves, Ch. J.

Tbe defendant in error purchased a farm, worth some-five thousand dollars, on which there was a mortgage, made by one Parish and wife to the plaintiff in error, to secure eight hundred dollars, with’ interest, and the purchase was made subject to such mortgage.

*332Or the 6th of December, 1870, Reed sent to Hazen by one Wesley Wheeler, one hundred and seventy-five dollars in money, to be paid on the mortgage, and Hazen received the money and sent back his receipt in these terms: “$75. Rec’d of H. Gr. Reed, by the hand of Wesley Wheeler, one hundred and seventy-five dollars, to apply…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wales v. LyonMichigan Supreme Court · 1851
  2. Egleston v. KnickerbackerNew York Supreme Court · 1849
  3. Lucius W. Stockton and Daniel Moore, in Error v. Harriet BishopSupreme Court of the United States · 1846
  4. Townsend v. JemisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1849

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Gunzberg v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
  2. Vogel v. Kalita (In Re Kalita)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan · 1996
  3. Tudryck v. MutchMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Kilander v. HooverIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Felton v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1882

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API